Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:16
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why do North Indians, living in Bangalore, not bother to learn Kannada?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
US oil output set for first annual drop since pandemic - Financial Times
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How long before AI can deliver an over-the-shoulder shot of a face in a film?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Unreleased GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 20GB memory spotted on eBay - VideoCardz.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Common herbal supplement used to beat stress linked to liver toxicity - Times of India
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.